Evol Ecol Res 10: 849-866 (2008)     Full PDF if your library subscribes.

Genetic and environmental contributions to the morphology of lake and stream stickleback: implications for gene flow and reproductive isolation

Diana M.T. Sharpe,¹ Katja Räsänen,² Daniel Berner¹ and Andrew P. Hendry¹

¹Redpath Museum and Department of Biology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada and ²ETH-Zurich, Institute of Integrative Biology and EAWAG, Department of Aquatic Ecology, Duebendorf, Switzerland

Correspondence: A.P. Hendry, Department of Biology, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montréal, Québec H3A 2K6, Canada.
e-mail: andrew.hendry@mcgill.ca

ABSTRACT

Question: Do the morphological differences between wild lake and stream stickleback have a genetic basis?

Organisms: Wild-caught and laboratory-reared threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from Misty Lake, and from its inlet and outlet streams.

Methods: A common-garden experiment was used to examine the genetic and environmental components of morphological variation. Morphology was quantified through multivariate body shape (geometric morphometrics) and through a suite of linear measurements.

Conclusions: The most striking morphological differences between the inlet and lake populations have a genetic basis, whereas those between the outlet and lake populations do not. Most notably, inlet fish have genetically deeper bodies, shorter pelvic and dorsal spines, and deeper caudal peduncles than do lake or outlet fish. All traits showed substantial plasticity; however, the relative differences between ecotypes were similar in the wild and the laboratory. These genetically based morphological differences may contribute to several ecologically dependent reproductive barriers between lake and inlet stickleback.

Keywords: adaptive divergence, common-garden experiment, geometric morphometrics, phenotypic change vector analysis, phenotypic plasticity.

DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.

 

        © 2008 Diana M.T. Sharpe. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.

       Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.

       All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.