Evol Ecol Res 14: 31-49 (2012) Full PDF
Revenge of the host: cannibalism, ontogenetic niche shifts, and the evolution of life-history strategies in host–parasitoid systems
Volker H.W. Rudolf1, Ian Sorrell2 and Amy B. Pedersen3
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA, 2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK and 3Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Correspondence: V.H.W. Rudolf, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
e-mail: volker.rudolf@rice.eduABSTRACT
Question: How does cannibalism in the host alter the evolution of a parasitoid’s oviposition strategy? Can differences in cannibalism risk between parasitized and healthy hosts alter the stage-specific foraging of parasitoids? Can host-specific differences in cannibalistic behaviour explain why parasitoids vary in what host stages they attack?
Mathematical methods: We examined the evolutionary dynamics of a stage-structured host–parasitoid model using two complementary approaches: (1) individual-based numerical simulations of evolutionary dynamics, and (2) the theory of adaptive dynamics focusing on evolutionarily stable strategies (ESSs).
Assumptions: Cannibalism in the host is assumed to be stage structured, with larger stages consuming smaller stages. The consumption of parasitized hosts also results in killing of the parasitoid’s offspring. Vulnerability to cannibalism of parasitized versus healthy hosts was allowed to vary. The parasitoid’s preference for attacking early versus late host stages was the trait under selection and allowed to evolve.
Results: When cannibalism rates increase relative to the parasitoid’s attack rates, the ESS of the parasitoid shifts from attacking only early host stages to attacking only late host stages. This shift occurs at lower cannibalism rates when parasitized hosts are more susceptible to cannibalism than healthy hosts. Under equilibrium conditions, a small boundary area exists between these two regions where attacking only early or only late host stages are alternative ESSs. The threshold and alternative stable ESSs are the result of cannibalism, which creates a positive feedback between the parasitoid’s oviposition rate and its own mortality. Intermediate strategies, where parasitoids evolve to attack both stages, occur only when host populations exhibit large population oscillations or when generalist parasitoids that attack both stages have a foraging advantage.
Keywords: cannibalism, life-history evolution, mutual predation, ontogenetic niche shift, role reversal, size structure.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
© 2012 Volker H.W. Rudolf. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.