Evol Ecol Res 12: 589-602 (2010) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
The effects of apical meristem damage on growth and defences of two Acacia species in the Negev Desert
Mitrani Department for Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer, Israel
Correspondence: D. Ward, School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa.
Question: Does removal of the apical meristem result in compensatory responses or overcompensation?
Hypotheses: There will be increased investment in axillary meristems and lateral branches and reduced investment in defences. There will be trade-offs between investment in different types of defence and trade-offs between defence and growth.
Organisms: Young Acacia gerrardii and A. raddiana trees.
Field site: Greenhouse, Blaustein Desert Research Institutes, Negev Desert, Israel.
Methods: The treatments were: (1) a control (no removal of either the apical meristem or biomass); (2) removal of the apical meristem only; (3) removal of 75% of the biomass of the plant including removal of the apical meristem; and (4) removal of 75% of the biomass of the plant excluding removal of the apical meristem.
Conclusions: There was no sign of overcompensation or compensatory responses in the experimentally manipulated plants. Plants with the apical meristem removed did not produce more lateral branches. Protecting the apical meristem appeared to be important, although this was only apparent when 75% of the biomass was also removed. There were trade-offs between chemical defences (condensed tannins) and mechanical defences (mean number of thorns) in A. gerrardii but not in A. raddiana. There were also trade-offs between defence and growth in A. gerrardii. I detected several positive correlations between mechanical defences and growth parameters in both species, indicating that mechanical defences may be part of a suite of growth-related traits.
Keywords: anti-herbivore defence, compensatory responses, overcompensation, plant–animal interactions, resource availability hypothesis, secondary metabolites, tolerance, trade-offs.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2010 David Ward. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.