Evol Ecol Res 12: 307-325 (2010) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
The impact of adaptive defence on top-down and bottom-up effects in systems with intraguild predation
Peter A. Abrams and Simon R. Fung
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Correspondence: P.A. Abrams, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Harbord Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G5, Canada.
Questions: How does adaptive prey defence alter the responses of a system with intraguild predation to the bottom-up effects of enrichment and the top-down effects of predator mortality? Is the cost of defence an important determinant of the answer to this first question? Is persistence and/or increase of the prey population following enrichment more likely when the prey have adaptive defence?
Methods: General equilibrium analysis of a simple model of the three-species intraguild predation system is used to determine the signs of population responses to top-down and bottom-up perturbations. Simulations are used to explore systems with unstable dynamics.
Key assumptions: The system consists of three species, and all consumer species have linear functional responses in the absence of flexible prey defence.
Results: Adaptive defence allows the equilibrium prey abundance to increase with enrichment of the basal resource. Defence may allow prey persistence over all possible levels of enrichment when high levels of defence imply near-immunity from predation. Predicting the direction of change in prey abundance in response to top-down or bottom-up perturbations requires knowledge of the costs of prey defence. The direction of response of abundance to a perturbation often changes sign when the perturbation shifts the system from stable to cyclic dynamics. Given costly defence, intraguild predation systems and food chains exhibit qualitatively similar responses to top-down and bottom-up perturbations in stable systems.
Keywords: adaptive behaviour, anti-predator behaviour, bottom-up effect, food chain, intraguild predation, omnivory, top-down effect.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2010 Peter A. Abrams. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.