Evol Ecol Res 10: 599-610 (2008) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Does immunity vary with population density in wild populations of Mormon crickets?
Nathan W. Bailey,* Brian Gray and Marlene Zuk
Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Background: Parasite transmission rate often increases with population density, and selection is expected to favour individuals that differentially allocate immune resources according to future population density (density-dependent prophylaxis). Laboratory studies uphold these predictions, but field studies sometimes contradict them.
Question: Do wild populations of Mormon crickets show density-dependent prophylaxis?
Organisms: Cryptically coloured low-density, and darkly melanized high-density, populations of Mormon crickets (Anabrus simplex).
Methods: Over 2 years, we assessed two measures of immunity, encapsulation ability and lysozyme activity, in populations with known genetic relationships.
Results: Individuals from consistently high-density populations showed greater immune responses. Increases in each immune parameter were positively associated with cuticular melanization. Despite the broad correspondence between high population density and increased immunity, immune variation in wild Mormon crickets appears to be predominated by population-level effects, as opposed to the short-term flexibility in immunity expected under a conventional interpretation of density-dependent prophylaxis.
Keywords: Anabrus simplex, density-dependent prophylaxis, ecological immunology, encapsulation, lysozyme activity.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2008 Nathan W. Bailey. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.