Evol Ecol Res 9: 1363-1374 (2007)     Full PDF if your library subscribes.

Phenotypic plasticity in laboratory mice and rats: a meta-analysis of current ideas on gut size flexibility

Daniel E. Naya,1* William H. Karasov2 and Francisco Bozinovic1

1Center for Advanced Studies in Ecology & Biodiversity and Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile and  2Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

Address all correspondence to Daniel Naya, Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, CP 6513677, Chile.
e-mail: dnaya@bio.puc.cl

ABSTRACT

Background: Animals’ digestive tract represents the functional link between foraging and the energy available for survival, growth, and reproduction. In addition, gut tissue is one of the most expensive tissues to maintain in terms of energy and protein metabolism. Thus, gut size flexibility has been suggested to be one of the most important physiological adjustments to cope with changes in environmental conditions.

Hypotheses: (1) Animals adjust their digestive features to cope with changing environmental conditions, and increase gut size in parallel to increased food consumption. (2) Changes in different energy-demanding factors, such as lactation, pregnancy, and temperature, determine different magnitudes of gut size flexibility. (3) Changes in the amount of undigestible material in the diet mainly affect the size of the fermentative chambers, while changes in energy demands mainly affect the size of the small intestine. (4) The qualities of a demand, such as its relative intensity or duration, affect the amount of digestive flexibility.

Data incorporated: We focus on digestive organ length and dry mass of laboratory mice (Mus musculus) and white rats (Rattus norvegicus). We found and reviewed 25 studies that reported a total of 55 comparisons for small intestine length, 67 for small intestine dry mass, 25 for hindgut length, and 26 for hindgut dry mass.

Method of analysis: We conducted a meta-analysis in which we calculated the Hedges difference for each comparison, and using mixed-effects models plus heterogeneity tests to evaluate differences among factors.

Results: Although gut size flexibility was noted for all the experimental factors evaluated, there was variation in the amount of digestive flexibility determined by each factor. Changes in large intestine length were greater for changes in diet quality than for changes in energy-demanding factors, but this result was not observed for large intestine mass. A clear correlation between gut size flexibility and the number of pups reared during lactation was recorded.

Conclusions: The present analysis confirms previous hypotheses on gut size flexibility, providing strong quantitative support for them.

Keywords: digestive physiology, Mus musculus, phenotypic flexibility, Rattus norvegicus.

DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.

 

        © 2007 Daniel E. Naya. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.

       Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.

       All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.