Evol Ecol Res 9: 91-107 (2007)     Full PDF if your library subscribes.

Assessing patterns of senescence in Drosophila mojavensis reared on different host cacti

Luciano M. Jaureguy and William J. Etges*

Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA

Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
e-mail: wetges@uark.edu

ABSTRACT

Questions: Can senescence observed under laboratory conditions predict senescence under conditions thought to contribute to expression of intrinsic mortality rates in nature? Is senescence, under contrasting environmental conditions, described by alternative mortality models or by a single one with different parameter values?

Organism: Drosophila mojavensis. Many populations of this cactophilic species use one of two principal hosts, pitaya agria cactus (Stenocereus gummosus) or organ pipe cactus (Stenocereus thurberi), to carry out their life cycles.

Methods: Flies were grown on both cactus hosts and standard laboratory food over their entire life cycle. Adult mortality rates and mean longevity were calculated in all adult cohorts. We employed maximum likelihood procedures to determine which of four statistical models best described the mortality trajectories of these flies.

Conclusions: Mortality rates of flies grown on cacti were best described by Gompertz and Gompertz-Makeham models, whereas flies grown on laboratory media were best described by Logistic and Logistic-Makeham models. Rates of mortality decelerated at older ages in individuals grown on laboratory media, but not in cactus-reared flies. Models commonly used in Drosophila laboratory studies may be inadequate to accurately assess the shape of natural mortality risk functions.

Keywords: ageing, Drosophila, ecology, host cacti, mortality models.

DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.

 

        © 2007 Luciano M. Jaureguy. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.

       Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.

       All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.