Evol Ecol Res 8: 129-148 (2006) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Local extinctions in flocking birds in Amazonian forest fragments
Kyle S. Van Houtan,1 Stuart L. Pimm,1* Richard O. Bierregaard Jr.,2,3 Thomas E. Lovejoy2,4 and Philip C. Stouffer2,5
1Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA, 2Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil, 3Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC, USA, 4The H. John Heinz III Center for Science Economics and the Environment, Washington, DC, USA and 5School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Address all correspondence to Stuart L. Pimm, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Box 90328, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Questions: Does the tendency to join flocks predispose a bird species to local or global extinction? Does the ability to revise particular social preferences in fragmented landscapes confer greater persistence? Do solitary species of birds persist longer in small forest patches?
Background: Social carnivores range more widely than solitary carnivores and are more prone to local extinction in fragmented landscapes. Flocking bird species typically range over larger areas than solitary ones, thus potentially encountering threats in and beyond the edges of their habitat more often than solitary species.
Data: A 14-year bird-capture database from the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP) near Manaus, Brazil.
Methods: From the literature, from independent field observations and mist-net captures we identified 30 species that join mixed flocks or follow ant swarms. We quantify the tendency for these species to flock both before and after habitat fragmentation. We test the effect of flocking on understory species’ persistence in forest fragments of 1, 10 and 100 ha.
Results: Species that typically forage in flocks before plot isolation persist for shorter times than those that infrequently join flocks. Species that drop out of flocks after fragmentation persist longer than those that remain in flocks. Our model outperformed a nested analysis of variance that treated each species as a variable, inherently testing for life-history idiosyncrasies and phylogeny. Recapture rates, calculated using MARK, did not explain the residual variation from our model. Flocking behaviour, and its plasticity, influence species persistence and so are important criteria in understanding local extinction.
Keywords: BDFFP, correlates of extinction, flocking propensity, fragmentation, understory flocks.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2006 Stuart L. Pimm. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.