Evol Ecol Res 8: 115-128 (2006) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Functional response and prey defence level in an experimental predator–prey system
Res Altwegg,* Margaret Eng, Stephanie Caspersen and Bradley R. Anholt
Department of Biology, University of Victoria, PO Box 3020, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3N5, Canada
Address all correspondence to Res Altwegg, Avian Demography Unit, Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
Questions: How do defences expressed only in the presence of predators (inducible defences) affect the relationship between the number of prey eaten and prey density (the predator’s functional response)? What is the relationship between prey defence level and vulnerability? Do inducible defences show features that are likely to stabilize predator–prey dynamics on theoretical grounds?
Organisms: We conducted experiments in a laboratory system. The prey was the protist Euplotes octocarinatus, exposing different levels of a morphological inducible defence. The predator was the turbellarian Stenostomum virginianum.
Methods: We analysed the data using non-linear mixed effects models that combine non-linear curve fitting with random effects.
Results: This predator’s functional response was a sigmoid Holling-Type III. The induced defence lowered the maximum number of prey that predators ate, suggesting that the defence increased the predator’s handling time. The level of defence expressed by Euplotes depended on the level of predator cue. There was a negative exponential decline in the number of prey eaten with increasing level of defence. Low levels of defence were thus effective and further increases in defence improved prey survival only slightly. The possibility for prey to become nearly invulnerable, the effectiveness of low levels of defence, and variation in vulnerability all suggest that this inducible defence can stabilize community dynamics.
Keywords: Akaike’s information criterion, induced defence, model selection, non-linear mixed effects model, phenotypic plasticity, predator–prey interaction, random effects.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2006 Res Altwegg. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.