Evol Ecol Res 8: 195-211 (2006)     Full PDF if your library subscribes.

Effects of taxon abundance distributions on expected numbers of sampled taxa

Matthew A. Kosnik1* and Peter J. Wagner2

1Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 and  2Department of Geology, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605, USA

Address all correspondence to M.A. Kosnik, Centre for Coral Reef Biodiversity, School of Marine Biology and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.
e-mail: mkosnik@alumni.uchicago.edu


Question: Holding both the true number of taxa and their evenness constant, what is the effect of the shape of the abundance distribution on the number of sampled taxa?

Method: We examine the effects of three types of abundance distribution (geometric, log-normal and Zipf) on the expected number of sampled taxa using Hurlbert’s equation (1971, equation 14). First, we examine the differences in the number of sampled taxa for the three distributions given the same true number of taxa and true evenness. Second, we determine the sample sizes needed to find more taxa from a taxon-rich, low-evenness collection than found in a taxon-poor, high-evenness collection with the same model distribution.

Conclusions: Independently of the true number of taxa and evenness, the shape of the abundance distribution affects the number of taxa expected in a sample. Given moderate to large sample sizes, a Zipf distribution will yield the most taxa, whereas a geometric distribution will yield the fewest. When comparing collections with the same model distributions, it takes the smallest sample sizes to recognize that a taxon-rich, low-evenness Zipf distribution has more taxa than does a taxon-poor, high-evenness Zipf distribution. It requires the largest sample sizes to do this when both are geometric distributions. A necessary implication of these results is that no simple evenness metric can predict the same number of sampled taxa given the same true number of taxa, true evenness and sample size but different model distributions.

Keywords: abundance distributions, evenness, geometric, log-normal, Pielou’s J, sampled diversity, sampled richness, Zipf.

IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.


        © 2006 Matthew A. Kosnik. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.

       Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.

       All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.