Evol Ecol Res 6: 77-87 (2004) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Which trees do wild common brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) prefer? Problems and solutions in scaling laboratory findings to diet selection in the field
Nilla J. Scrivener,1 Christopher N. Johnson,2 Ian R. Wallis,3
Midori Takasaki,3‡ William J. Foley3 and
Andrew K. Krockenberger1*
1School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4878, 2School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811 and 3School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Address all correspondence to Andrew K. Krockenberger, School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, QLD 4878, Australia.
In this study, we examined whether a group of plant secondary metabolites – the formylated phloroglucinol compounds (FPCs), which are known to deter feeding on eucalypt foliage by captive marsupial folivores – influence feeding by wild common brushtail possums. There was at least a six-fold range of FPC concentrations in the foliage of individual trees within a single eucalypt species. Possums largely avoided trees with high FPC concentrations. While some trees with low FPCs were used heavily, others were not; thus the relationship between FPC concentration and tree use was polygonal rather than linear. We used a randomization procedure to demonstrate a relationship between the upper limits of FPC concentration and tree use. In contrast, this procedure showed that neither the nitrogen content nor the in vitro digestibility of the leaves influenced the use of trees by possums. Our results show that plant secondary metabolites, with a demonstrable mode of action, affect the selection of individual eucalypt trees by wild folivores. Thus, FPC concentrations may influence the distribution and abundance of marsupial folivores at landscape scales.
Keywords: diet selection, Eucalyptus, marsupial folivores, plant secondary metabolites.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2004 Andrew K. Krockenberger. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.