Evol Ecol Res 3: 667-686 (2001) Full PDF if your library subscribes.
Inequality of opportunity: measuring the potential for sexual selection
Daphne J. Fairbairn1* and Angela E. Wilby2
1Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA and 2Department of Biology, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Boulevard West, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1M8, Canada
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
The opportunity for selection (I) is defined as the variance in relative fitness and sets the upper limit for the intensity of selection on any given trait. For Poisson or binomial fitness variables such as mating success or survival, I is mathematically dependent upon both mean fitness and sample size. Covariation with both mean mating success (x̄) and the number of individuals competing for mates (n) is typical of most indices of inequality (i.e. indices of spatial dispersion, resource monopolization and reproductive skew) and confounds comparisons among populations. Several standardized indices of inequality have been developed that remove the confounding influence of x̄ and n. We assessed the utility of these standardized indices as measures of the potential for sexual selection on male mealworm beetles. Specifically, we compared the opportunity for sexual selection (Is) with the index of resource monopolization (Q), Morisita’s index (Iδ) and the standardized Morisita index (Ip). We estimated male mating success from repeated scan samples in two separate experiments. Experiment 1 comprised nine treatments with all combinations of 10, 20 or 30 males and females, replicated three times for a total of 27 populations. Experiment 2 consisted of five populations with 10 males and 10, 20, 25, 30 or 35 females respectively. As expected, we found Is to be negatively correlated with mean mating success and positively correlated with both number of males and sex ratio. In contrast, the indices of inequality increased as the sex ratio moved away from 1:1 in either direction, and reached maximum values at strongly female-biased sex ratios. We hypothesize that this concave relationship reflects a shift in the relative importance of female choice and male–male competition at female-biased versus male-biased sex ratios. We compare the properties of all four indices and recommend Morisita’s index as the best estimator of the potential for sexual selection.
Keywords: mating success, Morisita’s index of dispersion, opportunity for selection, relative fitness, resource monopolization, sexual selection, Tenebrio molitor.
DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.
© 2001 Daphne J. Fairbairn. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.
Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.
All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.