Evol Ecol Res 3: 553-565 (2001)     Full PDF if your library subscribes.

Site fidelity in habitats with contrasting levels of nest predation and brood parasitism

Kenneth A. Schmidt

Department of Biology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA

Address all correspondence to Kenneth A. Schmidt, Department of Biology, Williams College, 59 Lab Campus Drive, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.
e-mail: caracal7@aol.com

ABSTRACT

The phenomenon of site fidelity (i.e. remaining faithful to sites where an individual has bred successfully in the past) has been documented for many taxa, especially birds. It has been suggested that individuals may use a simple rule of thumb: stay (or return) if breeding was successful, or switch to a new site if breeding was unsuccessful (win-stay:lose-switch; WSLS). Using simulations, I examined the evolutionary dynamics of the WSLS strategy in competition with two alternative strategies: stay-always (SA; total site fidelity) and two forms of an ideal free settling strategy (IFS; site indifferent). I considered two habitats identical in all respects except that one habitat (low quality) had a higher level of nest predation than the other. Between breeding seasons, females: (1) remained in a habitat if they successfully bred or otherwise dispersed to the alternative habitat (WSLS); (2) remained in the habitat regardless of their breeding success (SA); or (3) settled within habitats such that the quality of the highest ranking unoccupied territory was equalized, when possible, across habitats (IFS). The WSLS strategy invades and replaces either of the alternative strategies. I then examined the consequences of the WSLS strategy on population density and mean fecundity across two habitats that had contrasting levels of nest predation or brood parasitism. Unlike contrasting predation rates between habitats, higher levels of brood parasitism in the low-quality habitat rapidly drained away individuals from the better habitat. This result, however, depended both qualitatively and quantitatively on differences (or the lack thereof) in predation between the two habitats. A second invasibility analysis conducted on populations experiencing contrasting brood parasitism between habitats indicated that the WSLS resists invasion by the SA strategy but not the IFS strategy. The IFS strategy resists invasions by either alternative. Thus cowbird brood parasitism may rapidly drain individuals away from high-quality habitat because birds cannot discriminate between low- and high-quality habitats. Furthermore, parasitism alters the evolutionary dynamics of competing site fidelity strategies.

Keywords: brood parasitism, evolutionarily stable strategy, habitat selection, metapopulation, nest predation, site fidelity songbirds.

DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.

 

        © 2001 Kenneth A. Schmidt. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.

       Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.

       All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.