Evol Ecol Res 3: 27-35 (2001)     Full PDF if your library subscribes.

Aggregative egg distributions may promote species co-existence – but why do they exist?

Thomas S. Hoffmeister and Marko Rohlfs

Zoological Institute, Ecology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Am Botanischen Garten 1–9, D-24098 Kiel, Germany

Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.
e-mail: thoffmeister@zoologie.uni-kiel.de

ABSTRACT

Although the effects of aggregated egg distributions for the co-existence of Drosophila species are fairly well understood, the driving forces that select for such egg distributions remain unclear. This study investigated the fitness consequences of Drosophila oviposition behaviour on natural breeding substrates under controlled conditions. We used fruits of Sorbus aucuparia as an oviposition substrate and recorded the clutch sizes that Drosophila subobscura females produce and the way in which individuals distribute their eggs across fruits. We found that D. subobscura females significantly aggregated their eggs. We tested the two most obvious hypotheses that might explain the distribution pattern of the eggs. Neither the hypothesis that larvae benefit from resource-dependent facilitation when feeding in groups, nor the hypothesis that Sorbus fruits might provide a negatively density-dependent refuge against parasitoid attack, is supported by our data. In contrast, our results suggest that flies should distribute their eggs regularly across fruits if the maximization of offspring survival is the selecting force. We discuss under which circumstances the observed distribution pattern might be adaptive.

Keywords: Allee effect, Drosophila subobscura, egg distribution, fitness, individual behaviour, parasitoids, refuge.

DOWNLOAD A FREE, FULL PDF COPY
IF you are connected using the IP of a subscribing institution (library, laboratory, etc.)
or through its VPN.

 

        © 2001 Thomas S. Hoffmeister. All EER articles are copyrighted by their authors. All authors endorse, permit and license Evolutionary Ecology Ltd. to grant its subscribing institutions/libraries the copying privileges specified below without additional consideration or payment to them or to Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. These endorsements, in writing, are on file in the office of Evolutionary Ecology, Ltd. Consult authors for permission to use any portion of their work in derivative works, compilations or to distribute their work in any commercial manner.

       Subscribing institutions/libraries may grant individuals the privilege of making a single copy of an EER article for non-commercial educational or non-commercial research purposes. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also use articles for non-commercial educational purposes by making any number of copies for course packs or course reserve collections. Subscribing institutions/libraries may also loan single copies of articles to non-commercial libraries for educational purposes.

       All copies of abstracts and articles must preserve their copyright notice without modification.